transport · chemistry · environment
the clean fuel that warms the sea
Ammonia combustion N2O slip in marine engines erodes climate benefit
Problem statement
Ammonia is a leading candidate zero-carbon fuel for shipping, but its combustion in marine engines produces nitrous oxide (N2O) — a greenhouse gas with ~273× the warming potential of CO2 over 100 years. At partial engine loads (which dominate actual ship operations during maneuvering and slow steaming), N2O emissions are worst and poorly characterized. No after-treatment catalyst simultaneously addresses NOx, N2O, and unburned ammonia slip across the full operating range.
Why this matters
International shipping accounts for roughly 3% of global CO2 emissions (~2.7% of global energy-related CO2; Wong et al. 2024). Ammonia is among the most viable zero-carbon fuels for deep-sea vessels because of its energy density and existing global handling infrastructure. But the climate case depends entirely on holding N2O slip near zero: modeling of a full ammonia-adoption scenario finds that tailpipe N2O from ammonia-powered ships would have climate impacts equivalent to 5.8% of current shipping CO2 emissions even at expected slip rates (Wong et al. 2024), and uncontrolled slip at the worst operating points erodes the benefit further — every gram of N2O carries the warming of ~273 grams of CO2.
What’s been tried and why it hasn’t worked
Engine manufacturers (MAN Energy Solutions, WinGD) are developing two-stroke ammonia engines, with WinGD reporting N2O below 3 ppm and ammonia slip below 10 ppm in testing, and MAN reporting N2O "typically well below 5 ppm" (Rouwenhorst 2025). Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is a mature NOx control for diesel engines. Dual-fuel engine designs co-fire ammonia with pilot fuels. However, the strongest results are at high load: MAN's own figures are under 1% CO2-equivalent (versus a fuel-oil engine) at full load but under 2% across the operating envelope, and systematic N2O data at the partial loads that dominate maneuvering and slow steaming remain sparse. SCR catalysts designed for NOx do not reliably decompose N2O. Engine-out emissions of unburned NH3 and N2O vary dramatically with ammonia/pilot fuel ratio and injection timing (Niki 2023), making single-catalyst solutions inadequate. No standardized emissions testing protocol exists for ammonia engines across real operating profiles.
What would unlock progress
After-treatment catalysts effective against N2O across partial to full load conditions. Combustion chamber geometries that minimize N2O formation at low loads. Standardized emissions testing protocols for ammonia marine engines across real operating profiles including maneuvering and slow steaming.
Entry points for student teams
A team could characterize N2O formation mechanisms in ammonia combustion at varying equivalence ratios and temperatures using a bench-scale combustor, mapping the conditions that maximize N2O production. A catalysis-focused team could screen candidate materials for simultaneous N2O decomposition and unburned ammonia oxidation. Combustion science, catalysis, and marine engineering skills apply.
Genome — every gene is a door
Structural cousins — same reason stuck, other fields
Sources
Anthony Y H Wong, Noelle E Selin, Sebastian D Eastham, Christine Mounaïm-Rousselle, Yiqi Zhang, Florian Allroggen (2024), "Climate and air quality impact of using ammonia as an alternative shipping fuel," Environmental Research Letters 19(8), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d07, Kevin Rouwenhorst, "Emission performance of ammonia-fueled, two-stroke marine engines," Ammonia Energy Association, 2025-05-06, Yoichi Niki (2023), "Experimental and numerical analysis of unburned ammonia and nitrous oxide emission characteristics in ammonia/diesel dual-fuel engine," International Journal of Engine Research, doi:10.1177/14680874231184722; IEA, Ammonia Technology Roadmap (2021), Accessed 2026-08-21 go to source 1 ↗ go to source 2 ↗ go to source 3 ↗
verification notes (working record)
The collection team’s own sourcing notes for this brief, kept verbatim:
This is a newly-created problem: ammonia marine engines don't yet exist at commercial scale, but the N2O formation chemistry is already identified as a potential showstopper. IMO is developing ammonia fuel regulations expected by 2025–2026. First commercial ammonia-fueled vessels expected 2025–2027. Related to but distinct from `energy-ammonia-cracking-hydrogen-delivery-penalty` (which addresses the energy cost of converting ammonia back to hydrogen, not combustion emissions).
Reconciliation 2026-08-21: This brief carried the corpus-wide signature exactly: sole-sourced to IEA topic pages that do not contain its claims — the IEA Ammonia Technology Roadmap (11 Oct 2021, fetched) is about decarbonizing ammonia production and explicitly places ammonia-as-fuel "not... within the core analytical scope," so none of the brief's engine-emissions figures could have come from the Source line. The numbers themselves mostly verified against real sources, now cited: N2O GWP-100 of 273 confirmed (EPA, "Understanding Global Warming Potentials," https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials, and IPCC AR6 as used by Wong et al.); shipping's ~3% share confirmed as 2.7% of global energy-related CO2 (Wong et al. 2024, Environmental Research Letters 19(8), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d07); the WinGD <3 ppm N2O figure confirmed real ("N2O emissions for the ammonia-fueled engine are below 3 ppm," with NH3 slip below 10 ppm — Rouwenhorst, Ammonia Energy Association, 2025-05-06), though the fetched source does not tie it to full load, so the full-load-vs-partial-load contrast was re-anchored to MAN's published figures in the same article (<1% CO2-equivalent at full load vs <2% across operation). One number was removed as unsourceable: "each milligram of N2O per gram of ammonia consumed reduces the climate benefit by ~25%" appears in no fetched source (back-of-envelope with GWP 273 gives ~20%, but no publication states it); replaced with Wong et al.'s modeled finding that tailpipe N2O from ammonia shipping equals 5.8% of current shipping CO2 climate impact. The uncited "SCR reduces NOx by 95%" was softened to qualitative since no source was attached. Engine-out variability with pilot-fuel ratio and injection timing re-anchored to Niki 2023 (International Journal of Engine Research, doi:10.1177/14680874231184722, confirmed via Crossref). Existing Source Notes text above (IMO regs "expected by 2025–2026," first vessels "expected 2025–2027") is left verbatim as a 2026-02-24-dated expectation. All new Source-line URLs fetched live 2026-08-21.